Author : Dr. thangavel. v
Keyword : Ethics- journalology, open science- social sciences and humanities-source-academic sources, scholarly sources-peer review-peer review literature-peer review articles-peer review journals-important of journals-journal format-peer review process-types
Subject : Science and technology
Article Type : Original article (research)
Article QR Code
Article File : Full Text PDF
Abstract : Pre-publication Peer review has long been seen as a crucial component of academic publishing. Many people still view this examination and critical evaluation by specialists as vital, despite numerous objections and flaws. This chapter explains what may be reasonably expected from peer review and what constitutes excellent practice, putting a special focus on the editor's crucial role. Additionally, it describes the various modifications being made to traditional peer review, the new models that are emerging, and the growing importance of openness and transparency. Several issues are addressed, such as the difficulty in locating reviewers, the global imbalance between publication output and peer review participation, the 'wastage' of reviews that results from the repetitive submission of manuscripts to journals after journals after rejection, and the mounting pressure on researchers to publish not only in general but also in high-impact journals. The burden of editors and journal peer-review processes are both impacted by all of these. Researchers eager to publish their work without unnecessary delay are accepting the latest innovation to focus exclusively on the examination of the soundness of research methodology and reporting prior to publishing, and an increasing number of publishers are adopting it as well. The evaluation of interest, importance, and possible influence is postponed in this model until after publication. In the online environment, there are many opportunities for post-publication assessment and evaluation, but there are also many difficulties. It is evident that approximately three and a half centuries after the first journals were published, there are more options than ever for peer review innovation and experimentation. The study covered a variety of peer review sources and their significance, standardization implementation, journal format processes, and transparent peer review cascade with future recommendations for educational experiments, ne
Article by : DR THANGAVEL V
Article add date : 2024-05-06
How to cite : Dr. thangavel. v. (2024-May-06). The important role of peer review sources and their various functions in improving to international journals standards. retrieved from https://www.openacessjournal.com/abstract/1729